From time to time, Noah’s Ark resurfaces as a topic in the media. Recently, the Noah’s Ark Scans research group published a 3D scan of a geological formation in Turkey near Mount Ararat. Many believe this formation to be the biblical Noah’s Ark. Scientists claim that this structure could not have a natural origin. Could this really be the long-sought biblical vessel?
A Discovery in Turkey
In eastern Turkey, south of Mount Ararat and east of Mount Tendürek, lies a site that, since 1959, has been identified by many researchers as the biblical Noah’s Ark. Why this specific location? The Bible states that Noah’s Ark rested on the ‘mountains of Ararat’.1 South of Mount Ararat, near the village of Üzengili, there is a formation that resembles the shape of Noah’s Ark.
This formation was discovered in 1959 by Turkish captain İlhan Durupınar and was named after him. Between 2014 and 2019, scientists from the Noah’s Ark Scans project conducted geophysical research at the site. A few weeks ago, they published the results of their studies, including a 3D scan.2
The scan not only reveals the shape of a boat but also shows straight lines that, according to the researchers, could not have formed naturally. They propose that the three layers of the formation correspond to the three decks of Noah’s Ark. Additionally, the dimensions of the formation align with the biblical description of Noah’s Ark.3
Discovering Noah’s Ark would be an extraordinary confirmation that the story of the Flood actually occurred, which is why many researchers are actively searching for it. Could the Durupinar formation truly be Noah’s Ark?
Skepticism Among Geologists
Many scientists, particularly evolutionists, are skeptical of the findings of the Noah’s Ark Scans team. Geologists often argue that rock formations can sometimes resemble man-made structures.4 They claim the same is true of the Durupinar site. Furthermore, evolutionists assert that around 2500 BCE, humans would not have been capable of constructing a vessel large enough to hold all the animals mentioned in the Book of Genesis. They also completely dismiss the story of the Flood.
A Global Flood?
Does this mean we are not looking at Noah’s Ark? Was the biblical Flood and Noah’s Ark merely a myth that never happened? This requires deeper exploration.
Contrary to what evolutionary scientists suggest, a global flood could indeed have occurred. Geological formations and the fossils they contain, often interpreted by evolutionists as evidence of gradual species development over millions of years, are viewed by other scientists as proof of a global flood that rapidly buried animals, including dinosaurs.5
The evidence for a global flood is not limited to geological and paleontological data but also includes cultural history. The Bible is not the only source that recounts the story of a great flood. For some reason, many cultures around the world have myths about such an event.6 While the details vary, the fact that these legends exist is remarkable. Nearly all of these cultures describe a flood that covered the entire Earth, not just a portion of it. Even cultures in dry, desert areas, such as the Aborigines in Australia, have their own versions of a worldwide flood myth.

Could Noah’s Ark Still Exist Today?
What about the Durupinar site? Skeptical voices about the findings of Noah’s Ark Scans come not only from evolutionists. Dr. Andrew Snelling, a geologist and head of research at the creationist organization Answers in Genesis, explains: ‘We do not expect the Ark to have survived and been available to find after 4,350 years. With no mature trees available for Noah and his family to build shelters after they got off the Ark, there is every reason to expect they dismantled the Ark (which they didn’t need anymore) to salvage timber from it’.
Additionally, the Durupinar site is located in a valley, not on a mountain as described in Genesis. The precise meaning of the term ‘mountains of Ararat’ (Gen. 8:4, which refers to ‘mountains’ in the plural) and their exact location remain unclear. However, this structure lies on the surface of a lava flow (under mudslides) from a volcano that, like the one on Mount Ararat, erupted after the Flood. The Ark came to rest on a mountain on the 150th day of the Flood. If this mountain had been an active volcano, it would have presented a serious danger to both Noah and the Ark.7
This suggests that the Durupinar site may indeed be a natural geological formation. It is also possible that it is a structure built by ancient humans. However, it seems unlikely that it is the biblical Noah’s Ark.
Other Possible Locations for Noah’s Ark
It is worth noting that Durupinar is not the only site where Noah’s Ark is believed to have rested. According to current Christian tradition, Noah’s Ark came to rest on Mount Ararat itself, and many researchers focus their attention there.8 However, Mount Ararat is a volcanic mountain, which would have implications for Noah’s Ark, as noted by Dr. Snelling.
Furthermore, Mount Ararat has only been known by this name since the Middle Ages. The traditional Armenian name for this mountain is Masis—a sacred mountain in the local pagan religion. When Christianity reached the Armenians, accompanied by the biblical story of the Flood, there was initially little interest in the mountain. This changed during the Crusades, when Armenians began associating Mount Masis with the biblical ‘mountains of Ararat’ to encourage crusaders to liberate their nation from Muslim Turks.9 Hence, the name Ararat became attached to the mountain and has remained so ever since.
Earlier Christian tradition in Armenia placed the ‘mountains of Ararat’ in the region of the ancient kingdom and Roman province of Corduene (or Kurdistan), south of Lake Van in Turkey and north of Upper Mesopotamia10. Islamic tradition also places Noah’s Ark in this region, specifically on Mount Judi (or Cudi), located at the intersection of Turkey, Syria, and Iraq11. In ancient times, the kingdom of Urartu existed around Lake Van, encompassing the region of Corduene and Mount Judi. It is believed that the Hebrew name ‘Ararat’ derives from ‘Urartu’.
Could this be the area where the remains of Noah’s Ark should be sought?
By the way, we recommend reading the articles:
- Did Dinosaurs Coexist with Humans?
- The Flood in Native American Legends of the Grand Canyon
- What is the Source of the Genetic Code?
- What Did the Miller-Urey Experiment Actually Prove?
- Defining the Human-Animal Divide
Footnotes
- The Bible, New King James Version, 1982, Genesis 8:4; cf. Isaiah 37–38.
- This might be Noah’s Ark. Scientists present strong arguments, Onet News, October 12, 2021, https://wiadomosci.onet.pl/swiat/arka-noego-w-gorach-w-turcji-naukowcy-maja-trzy-mocne-argumenty/nkjydbd
- The Bible, New King James Version, 1982, Genesis 6:15.
- Radford B., Noah’s Ark Discovered … Again and Again, LiveScience, September 5, 2006, https://www.livescience.com/7137-noah-ark-discovered.html
- Snelling A. A., Geologic Evidences for the Genesis Flood, Answers Magazine, 2007 (4), pp. 81–83, https://answersingenesis.org/the-flood/geologic-evidences-for-the-genesis-flood/
- White M., Flood Legends, Answers Magazine, 2007 (2), pp. 18–20, https://answersingenesis.org/the-flood/flood-legends/flood-legends/
- Ham K., “Boat-Like Formation” Matching Noah’s Ark Discovered in Turkey?, Answers in Genesis, October 7, 2021, https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/boat-like-formation-matching-noahs-ark-discovered-turkey/
- Snelling A. A., Is Noah’s Ark on Mount Ararat?, Answers Magazine, 2017 (3), pp. 54–62, https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/noahs-ark-found/noahs-ark-mount-ararat/
- Petrosyan H., The Sacred Mountain, in: Abrahamian L., Sweezy N. (eds.), Armenian Folk Arts, Culture, and Identity, Indiana University Press, 2001, p. 36.
- Ibid.
- Lewis J. P., Noah and the Flood: In Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Tradition, The Biblical Archaeologist, December 1984, p. 237.
© Source of main image: Leonardo.ai.
The portal EvolutionOfThinking.org, created by the Research and Education Institute, focuses on education and the dissemination of knowledge related to research on various aspects of human well-being.

